Aviation License Suspended By FAA And Its Not The First Time
April 8, 2010 -
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an emergency cease
and desist orders against Darby Aviation as the FAA does not believe at
this time the company has the ability to ensure safe operations.
The FAA also has
determined that Darby Aviation’s chief pilot and its Director of
Operations are not qualified to hold their positions. The company’s lack
of proper operating guidance and its failure to follow basic regulatory
requirements has undermined the FAA’s confidence in Darby Aviation’s
ability to ensure safe operations.
“The FAA will not let a carrier continue to operate if it doesn’t meet strict qualifications,” said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. “All carriers, no matter what the size, must have approved pilot training programs. Our mission is to keep air travelers safe.”
Based on those considerations, the FAA determined that emergency action was necessary. Darby Aviation may appeal the emergency order within 10 days of receiving the order. This is not the first time the company has had it license suspended.
On Feb. 2, 2005,
Platinum Jet Challenger 600, N370V was destroyed in a post crash
fire after it overran runway 6 at
The company that hired Platinum Jet was unaware that Platinum Jet was actually a Part 95 operation. In January 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued emergency cease and desist orders against both Platinum and Darby.
In April 2005, The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Administrative Law Judge William R. Mullins dismissed the emergency order against Darby. However, A few weeks later the NTSB reversed its decision and reinstating the emergency cease and desist order until Darby "demonstrates to the satisfaction of the FAA that it had not surrendered operational control of its certificate.
Darby Aviation (“Darby”) was the holder of an Air Carrier Certificate authorizing operations under Parts 119 and 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. Darby’s operations specifications authorized Darby to conduct operations under the business name of AlphaJet International.
In November 2003,
AlphaJet entered into an agreement with Platinum Jet Management
(“Platinum”), entitled “Charter Management Agreement.” At the time
Platinum did not hold an air carrier certificate under Part 119 and did
not have operations specifications to operate under Part 135. Darby
d/b/a AlphaJet’s operations specifications and its manual did not list
Platinum or its agents, contractors, or employees as authorized to
exercise operational control.
By virtue of the
Charter Management Agreement, from November 2003, February 2005, Darby
d/b/a AlphaJet caused, permitted, or allowed a scheme to exist by which
Platinum unlawfully operated passenger-carrying flights for compensation
|©AvStop Online Magazine Contact Us Return To News|