|
This is due in part to continued concerns with
the model’s incomplete, inaccurate, and outdated
data. Without a reliable inspector staffing
model, the FAA’s process for assessing the
number of inspectors and analysts it needs does
not differ significantly from prior ineffective
methods.
For example, inspector staffing processes vary
by region, which can lead to subjective and
inconsistent staffing decisions. Finally, the
FAA supplements its regular inspections through
its geographic surveillance program, a helpful
oversight tool. However, OIG identified concerns
with geographic inspector training and workload
levels that may undermine the program’s success.
OIG made seven recommendations to enhance the
FAA’s inspector staffing model and geographic
surveillance program; the FAA concurred with six
and partially concurred with one. OIG is
requesting additional information or a revised
response for two recommendations (see
report). |
