|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||
By Jim Douglas |
||||
August 11, 2010 -
The nation’s largest airlines reported only three flights in June with
tarmac delays of more than three hours compared to 268 flights in June
2009 and with no increase in the rate of canceled flights, according to
the Air Travel Consumer Report released on Tuesday by the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
On April 29, 2010,
United States DOT rules
bands airlines from allowing aircraft to sit out on the tarmac with
passengers for more than three hours. The consequence under this new
rule, airlines would have to pay $27,500 for each passenger stuck for
more than three hours on the tarmac.
|
||||
|
||||
In March Continental Chief Executive called the consumer “Tarmac Rule” stupid. In July a study done by two airline consultants who attempted to skew data to favor the airlines position on the law cast a shadow of doubt on the study after the government reported the information was misleading and a premature assessment of the impact of the new passenger protections. "Government Can Work" when you leave out the special interests and the executives of large corporations. According to information filed with the Bureau of
Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA), the only tarmac delays longer than
three hours reported in June 2010 by the 18 airlines who file on-time
performance with DOT involved three United Airlines flights departing
Chicago’s O’Hare airport on June 18, a day in which the Chicago area
experienced a severe thunderstorm. None of the tarmac delays exceeded the three-hour limit by more than five minutes. June was the second full month of data since the new aviation consumer rule went into effect on April 29. In May, the first full month, there were five reported tarmac times of more than three hours, down from 34 in May 2009. A subsequent DOT investigation determined that four of the five May flights were misreported by the airline. Corrected data will be available from BTS when the airline submits revised data. |