 |
|
November 1, 2010 -
A Miami grand jury returned an indictment against four former airline
executives of competing air cargo carriers for participating in a
conspiracy to fix surcharges on air cargo shipments from the
United States
to South and Central America following
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Department of Justice announced.
The one-count
indictment, returned in U.S. District Court in Miami, charges Guillermo
?Willy? Cabeza, George Gonzalez, Rodrigo Hernan Hidalgo, and Luis Juan
Soto with conspiring to suppress and eliminate competition by agreeing
to impose an increase to their fuel surcharges on air cargo shipped from
the United States to locations in South and Central America.
|
Each former
airline executive is charged with participating in the conspiracy
beginning in or around late September 2005 until at least November 2005.
According to the indictment, Cabeza, Gonzalez,
Hidalgo, and Soto, along with co-conspirators,
carried out the conspiracy by engaging in discussions, including at a
meeting in an office in the area of Miami?s Kendall-Tamiami Executive
Airport, and agreeing to impose an
increase to the fuel surcharge applied on flights from the United States to South and
Central America.
As part of the
conspiracy, Cabeza, Gonzalez, Hidalgo,
Soto and their co-conspirators engaged in communications to implement
and monitor the agreement and accepted payments at collusive and
noncompetitive rates. Cabeza is the former president of a
Miami-based air cargo carrier, Gonzalez is the former chief commercial
officer of a Peruvian air cargo carrier,
Hidalgo
is the former vice president of sales and marketing of a Miami-based air
cargo carrier, and Soto is the former president of a Miami-based air
cargo carrier. Air cargo carriers transport a variety of
cargo shipments, such as heavy equipment, perishable commodities, and
consumer goods, on scheduled international flights.
Cabeza,
Gonzalez,
Hidalgo, and Soto are charged with
price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum
penalty for each individual of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the
crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either
of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.
|