Airlines for America (A4A), the trade group which
represents the U.S. airlines also support the
breakup. But this comes at no surprise, as the airlines
would love to break off from the FAA as the agency has a
zero tolerance for the airline culture of passenger
abuse (Tarmac rule, Passenger Bill of Rights, etc.)
However, Delta Airlines has come out to appose the
breakup of ATC from the FAA.
Delta Airlines - "Air travelers could be on the hook to
cover 20 to 29 percent higher costs if the U.S. moves to
a private air traffic control (ATC) organization funded
through “user fees,” according to a new study released (The
Costs Of Privatizing Air Traffic Control And How It Will
Impact Airline Travelers) by Delta Air Lines.
“Proponents have claimed that privatization would lead
to cost savings for consumers,” the study stated. “But
no evidence has yet been produced to show that
privatization would reduce costs. In fact, nations that
have privatized ATC have seen operational costs increase
at a much higher rate than has been seen in the US
under the FAA.”
"The study, which is a compilation of data from various
independent reports, reviewed the ATC fees associated
with a privatized model in Canada and the United Kingdom
and found that after the first six years of
privatization, Canada saw an additional 59 percent
increase on ATC-related fees. In the United Kingdom,
ATC fees rose 30 percent. The study also included
examples of extreme tax increases, and outlined how a
privatized, revenue-based system could result in ATC
resources being prioritized at larger airports to raise
greater revenue, to the detriment of smaller regional
airports across the country.
"Delta has long held that removing the Air Traffic
Organization, which provides air navigation services
across the
U.S., out from under
FAA’s safety oversight is a bad idea for several
reasons. Capt. Steve Dickson, Senior Vice President –
Flight Operation"
A4A, CEO Nicholas Calio said an inefficient system costs
airlines and their customers $30 billion annually in
delays. “We applaud the hard and diligent work the
committee has done to produce a bill that could
accomplish for the national airspace system what others
have only talked about for years, putting it at the
forefront of aviation technology and innovation.”
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) President
Mark Baker said that AOPA supports the legislative
changes on
third class medical certification for general
aviation pilots. However, AOPA does not support the plan
to separate air traffic control from the FAA.
Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) said “I believe by separating
air traffic control into an independent ... corporation
and leaving behind the regulatory, the safety aspect, in
government, is something we need to do". Shuster
referring to the FAA "I do not believe they are suited
(to be) a high-tech service provider for the airlines
and the traveling public.”
When asked what a corporation can do that the FAA cannot
do, Shuster said “They can go to the markets and borrow
dollars and issue bonds to get the dollars necessary,
based on their cash flow, not based on an appropriations
cycle, to go forward and make the investments
(necessary) for the long term. Operating outside of the
government, they’re going to be outside of this
political pressure; if they want to change, modify,
reform, consolidate different aspects of this
organization, they will be able to do it.”
Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), CEO and
chairman, Jack J. Pelton said “EAA supports a stable,
predictable funding mechanism for the national airspace
system, but we oppose this bill as it is now written".
“To be fair, there are some good things in the bill for
general aviation, which the bill’s co-sponsors say
address GA concerns, especially the prohibition of user
fees, the reintroduction of aeromedical reform as
originally intended, certification reform, and
additional FAA authority to help deploy a future
high-octane unleaded fuel.
“What is also part of the bill, however, is an ATC
governance structure that heavily favors airlines and
commercial interests, and creates real threats to the
services that keep
America’s air traffic
system the safest and most effective in the world.
"ATC privatization carries the real possibility of
putting GA in the ‘big squeeze’ regarding fees,
services, airport access, and the individual freedom to
fly for grassroots and recreational flying.”
In
January Senator's Thad Cochran, Barbara Mikuiski, Susan
M. Collins and Kack Reed wrote, a letter of opposition
of the FAA being stripped of its authority to oversee
the FAA. "We are writing to express our opposition to
legislation that would separate the air traffic control
function of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
from the rest of the agency and remove that function
from the congressional appropriations process....... It
does not make sense to break apart the FAA, an essential
put of our success in aviation.... Furthermore, the
public would not be well served by exempting any part of
the FAA from annual congressional oversight."
|