|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
By Daniel Baxter |
||||
February 1, 2011 - The World Trade Organization which
oversees the drafting and implementation of rules for
global trade in goods and services, on Monday, ruled
that Boeing received improper subsidies from the
The finding affirmed WTO’s interim report that was
released back in September. Both Boeing and Airbus had
accused the each other of in proper government subsidies
which gave the rival company price advantages over the
other. Airbus has reported that from 2001 and 2006 it had lost as much as $45 billion in sales to Boeing as a result of the subsidies. Boeing had reported that it had lost $200 billion as a result of Airbus’s governmental subsidies. |
||||
The WTO
attempts in its findings to identify those who have violate the
global trade rules and not quantified the damages lost by either
side. On Monday Boeing released the following statement,
responding to public reports that the WTO panel deciding
European Union claims of
"Today's
reports confirm the interim news from last September that the
WTO rejected almost all of Europe's claims against the
"The WTO's
decisions confirm that European launch aid stands alone as a
massive illegal subsidy only available to Airbus, which has
seriously harmed Boeing, distorted competition in the aerospace
industry for decades, and resulted in the loss of tens of
thousands of good-paying "Today's decision will not require any change in policy or practice, or other remedy that comes close to approaching the billions of dollars of launch aid that must be repaid by Airbus or restructured on proven commercial terms. As a result of the June WTO ruling, EU governments and Airbus/EADS must repay or restructure $4 billion in still outstanding illegal launch aid subsidies Airbus received to develop the A380. They must also remedy the adverse effects of the additional $16 billion in other illegal subsidies Airbus received. |
"Under the WTO's
decisions, Airbus must now compete in the global marketplace without the
massive illegal subsidies it has received since its inception and
without which, the WTO held, Airbus would be 'a much different, and we
believe a much weaker' company than it is today. It will be required to
finance airplanes the same way Boeing does – with its own money. Having
recently announced it has more than $13 billion dollars of cash on hand,
Airbus should have no problem with this new requirement.
"Today's ruling
underscores our confidence in the WTO processes and dispute-resolution
procedures. We applaud the body for its work and continue to look to
Airbus/EADS and the EU to recognize that in today's global market,
everyone must play by the rules and abide by WTO requirements. Playing
by the rules, for Airbus/EADS, means withdrawing the still-outstanding
A380 prohibited launch aid subsidy and financing the A350 on commercial
terms. Airbus should confirm its intention to comply with the WTO's
decisions."
European
Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS) released its statement on
the WTO’s report. EADS, is a large pan-European aerospace and defense
corporation and a leading defense and military contractor worldwide. The
group includes Airbus as the leading manufacturer of commercial
aircraft, with Airbus Military covering tanker, transport and mission
aircraft; Eurocopter as the world's largest helicopter supplier; Astrium,
the European leader in space programs from Ariane to Galileo; and
Cassidian as a provider of comprehensive and integral systems solutions
for aerial, land, naval and civilian security applications.
“Today’s World
Trade Oganisation (WTO) decision confirms that Boeing has received
massive and illegal government subsidies for many decades, and that they
have had a significant and ongoing negative effect on European industry.
The final WTO-report to be publicly released in a few weeks can be
expected to say:
"Boeing would not
have been able to launch the 787 without illegal subsidies , has
received at least $5 billion of US taxpayer dollars which has been
determined illegal. Quantification of the additional subsides beyond
this figure will take place in later stages of this dispute if Boeing
chooses to pursue it.
“The effect of
these subsidies will continue in the future, putting Airbus at a
significant disadvantage. In concluding that Department of Defense (DoD)
and NASA funding are illegal subsidies, the WTO decision will require
fundamental changes to the
“The WTO can be
expected to say that the billions in subsidies benefiting Boeing have a
significantly greater distortive effect than the Reimbursable Loans to
Airbus. Airbus estimates at least $45 billion as a realistic figure
based on identified lost sales to Airbus as a result from the subsidies.
Taking the cases together, the WTO will be seen to now have specifically
green-lighted the continued use of loans in Europe and commanded Boeing
to end its illegal R&D cash support from NASA, DoD and the US taxpayers. |
|
©AvStop Online Magazine Contact Us Return To News |
|